Oct 21, 2025 | Formula 1
What happened
In Austin, a Red Bull mechanic tried to move the tape used by Lando Norris as a reference on the grid. This was noticed. The mechanic returned to the grid against instructions from officials and that resulted in a fine. The incident received a lot of attention and raises questions about sportsmanship in the title race.
Why Norris uses tape
F1 grid boxes are 2.7 metres wide. From the cockpit, you cannot see everything. Halo, low seating position and bodywork limit visibility. This makes it difficult to stop at exactly the right spot. If you are too far forward, you can get a penalty. If you are too far back, you lose starting positions.
For this, Norris works on a set routine with his race engineer. The latter sticks a piece of tape on the wall next to his grid spot. The tape is aligned with a fixed point on the car. After the formation lap, that tape allows Norris to stop precisely. This is a well-known method in other forms of motorsport and some other F1 drivers use something similar.
Why Red Bull would try to interfere
The advantage for Red Bull is clear. If you remove or move the tape, you could disrupt Norris' start. That could cause two things:
- He drives too carefully and is too far back, losing places.
- He is too far forward and risks a grid penalty.
Sources report that this is not the first time Red Bull would have tried this. It is, however, the first time they have been caught. McLaren adjusted the fixing of the tape in Austin so that the tape was harder to remove. Possibly that caused the hurried behaviour of the Red Bull mechanic and his return to the grid.
Sportsmanship and the rules
There is no clear rule explicitly forbidding taking someone's tape off the wall. The incident only came into focus because there was a violation with the return to the grid. Still, it touches on sporting conduct.
The FIA has rules about fairness and sporting conduct. The International Sporting Code states that any action that violates the principles of fairness or is intended to unfairly influence the outcome can be an offence. Whether the removal of tape is officially considered unsportsmanlike would depend on a formal complaint and decision by the FIA.
To indicate where the boundary becomes difficult, consider similar examples. These show how vague the boundary can be:
- Moving a helmet or gloves on the grid.
- Switching off heaters in tyres.
- Intentionally interfering with radio communications.
What this means for the title race
The incident shows how seriously both teams are taking this end of the season. Red Bull is looking for every opportunity to make things difficult for its rival. The team said every weekend must be perfect and is working hard to do so.
McLaren has shown it can take measures to protect itself better. It will be interesting to see if McLaren tightens the tape even more in Mexico and if Red Bull persists in trying to interfere.
Conclusion
It was a small but telling incident. Legally, it is not simple to punish it directly. However, it does raise questions about standards and good manners within F1. Expect teams to keep paying attention to such details during the decisive races.
Oct 21, 2025 | Formula 1
In a nutshell
McLaren says it has no major concerns about the title race. Team principal Andrea Stella believes Lando Norris had the speed to win in Austin. The problem was losing position at Turn 1 to Charles Leclerc.
What happened in Austin
Max Verstappen won the United States Grand Prix by almost eight seconds ahead of Norris. After that race, Verstappen is 40 points behind leader Oscar Piastri. Norris is 14 points off Piastri.
Stella stressed that the McLaren's underlying speed was encouraging. Without the battle with Leclerc at the start, he argued, Norris would have had a real chance of victory.
Norris on his race and qualifying
Norris was more nuanced. He found it difficult to get close to Leclerc. As a result, it proved difficult to then really attack Verstappen. According to Norris, part of the problem was in qualifying. He missed a perfect lap and he regretted that.
On strategy, Norris said the team did a good job. He stated that there were options, such as coming in earlier or trying to undercut. But on the soft tyres there are also risks, such as a safety car.
Sprint, set-up and lost data
McLaren lost valuable track data due to an incident in the sprint. Both cars were involved in a collision at Turn 1. This allowed the team to be less aggressive with tuning, such as driving heights. One or two millimetres can make a noticeable difference.
Stella said there was additional pace in the car that they did not fully utilise. He said this will not affect the planned upgrades. The development line remains the same for the rest of the season.
Key points
- McLaren believes the car was fast enough to win.
- Losing position to Leclerc at Turn 1 changed the race.
- Data loss in the sprint limited risky adjustment choices.
- McLaren remains confident of championship chances.
Looking ahead
Stella stressed that the title is still in his own hands. He called for calm and focus. McLaren wants to perform to the maximum and take every opportunity in the remaining races.
Oct 21, 2025 | Formula 1
Rule and brief explanation
Each Formula 1 team must run a 'rookie' twice per car in an FP1 session this season. A rookie is a driver with no more than one Grand Prix start to his name. This is the hard standard that teams must follow.
Some names have already completed the requirement. Kimi Antonelli (Mercedes), Isack Hadjar (Racing Bulls) and Gabriel Bortoleto (Sauber) came to their mandatory sessions in Australia and China.
Some drivers don't count. Ollie Bearman already started three times in Grands Prix last year, so he is no longer a rookie. Jack Doohan made his debut in Abu Dhabi last year. So technically, he could have counted as a rookie in Australia. However, Alpine was already using rookies for four sessions, so that situation was not a factor.
Mexico and notable names
Several young drivers are again on the list for the Mexico weekend. Williams puts in F2 driver Luke Browning. Aston Martin has Jak Crawford driving. Red Bull chooses Arvid Lindblad.
Crawford makes his first FP1 appearance in Formula 1. For Browning and Lindblad, it is their second free practice of the season.
In addition, IndyCar winner Pato O'Ward returns in a McLaren for an FP1 session.
Confirmed FP1 smoke runs by team
The table below shows the stakes known so far per team and per race.
- McLaren (3): Alex Dunne - Austria, Italy; Pato O'Ward - Mexico.
- Ferrari (2): Dino Beganovic - Bahrain, Austria.
- Red Bull (3): Ayumu Iwasa - Bahrain; Arvid Lindblad - Great Britain, Mexico.
- Mercedes (3): Kimi Antonelli - Australia, China; Frederick Vesti - Bahrain.
- Aston Martin (3): Felipe Drugovich - Bahrain, Hungary; Jak Crawford - Mexico.
- Alpine (4): Jack Doohan - Australia (not counted as a rookie); Paul Aron - three times (Italy + 2 races to be determined); Ryo Hirakawa - Japan.
- Haas (2): Ryo Hirakawa - Bahrain, Spain.
- Racing Bulls (2): Isack Hadjar - Australia, China.
- Williams (3): Luke Browning - Bahrain, Mexico; Victor Martins - Spain.
- Sauber (4): Gabriel Bortoleto - Australia, China; Paul Aron - Great Britain, Hungary.
What stands out?
Teams actively rotate riders. Some juniors drive for several teams in separate sessions. This provides extra experience for the young drivers. For teams, it is also a way to test talent without changing racing seats.
Oct 20, 2025 | Formula 1
Zak Brown reacted quickly and emotionally after the chain reaction crash in Turn 1 during the Austin sprint. His first statement was clear: he pointed to Nico Hulkenberg as the culprit, calling it amateurish driving in his opinion and stating that Hulkenberg hit Oscar Piastri. Later, Brown corrected himself on television and personally sent both Saubers team boss Jonathan Wheatley and Hulkenberg an apology text. That series of actions exposes the tension and stress within Formula 1.
The dynamics of a heat moment
In the heat of the moment, those involved often point in one direction. Brown did the same. He was on the pit wall, emotion high, two McLarens out and a world title race at stake. Wheatley acknowledged that emotion and downplayed the issue: 'he said it in the heat of the moment'. This makes it clear that public reactions from team leaders do not always reflect the final assessment of an incident.
Going back on your words: weakness or responsible leadership?
Brown chimed in after reviewing the footage. This is relevant. A public correction and personal apology do not show weakness. They show responsibility. In a world where public statements escalate quickly, a quick rectification has a calming effect. Brown chose to take responsibility for his earlier words and rectify the situation to the team involved and the driver.
Team internal assessment versus media pressure
McLaren decides to assess the clash between Norris and Piastri internally. Andrea Stella said a direct confrontation in Austin would be more distracting than beneficial and that 'reset' was a priority. That makes sense. Teams operate at the cutting edge. Taking out a rival in Turn 1 not only destroys race opportunities but also creates media pressure. Keeping things internal allows a team to look more rationally at cause, context and proportionate action.
Precedent and consequences
It refers to an earlier McLaren review after Singapore, which showed that Norris bore responsibility and received unspecified consequences. That precedent works both ways. It makes it clear that McLaren is willing to sanction driving behaviour if it fits within their racing framework. At the same time, it illustrates why public accusations from opponents must be weighed carefully. Too quick a public condemnation can undermine internal procedures or create expectations that are later not met.
What does Austin teach us about leadership and reputation in Formula 1?
First: passion remains a core value. Wheatley rightly mentions it: this is a passionate sport and emotions run high when two championship cars go out at the first corner. Second: mastery and process win in the long run. Brown did what was sensible: he corrected his position, contacted personally and did not let the incident become a permanent dispute between teams.
Conclusion
The events in Austin show the tension line between emotion and professional management. Zak Brown's initial reaction reflected the natural reaction of a team leader whose interests have been affected. His quick retraction and apology show that responsibility is more important than scoring points in the media. The same is true for McLaren: public condemnation helps little if the team wants to make its internal race framework and consistency policy work. In that balance between passion and control lies the key to both on-track success and credible off-track leadership.
Oct 20, 2025 | Formula 1
The US weekend at COTA showed once again that Formula 1 racing is not just about speed. Max Verstappen placed his title fight back in the limelight with 33 maximum points. But the main lesson of the Grand Prix is not about him: it was a race in which a sudden 180-degree turn of the wind, a brilliant strategic gamble by Ferrari and the physics of tyre management combined to undermine Norris' chances.
Wind: the invisible race leader
Since qualifying, the wind at COTA turned completely. A detail, but one that changed the whole dynamic. Whereas teams based their setups on one wind direction, during the race, tailwinds suddenly appeared in the slow corners. Tailwind increases the demand for mechanical grip - exactly where the soft tyre excels and the hard tyre falls short. Ferrari understood this and put Leclerc on softs. That choice proved crucial.
Ferrari's gamble and why McLaren stranded
Charles Leclerc started from the second row of the grid on softs with the intention of taking the lead with better traction and clean air. The start worked: Leclerc gained superior traction and pushed past Norris. For McLaren, there were two problems at once: Norris was stuck behind a Ferrari that held reason ahead of him, while Verstappen ran away undisturbed. By the end of the opening lap, Verstappen was already 1.4 seconds ahead.
More importantly, the hard tyre proved too slow on this track and with that wind. A one-stop strategy remained necessary, however, as tyre temperatures and casing stress made it impossible to push hard enough that an extra pit stop paid off. That forced many drivers into long opening stints on mediums, making a combination of medium and soft inevitable - and McLaren was thus stuck with a long stint.
Norris' battle: racecraft against tyre physiology
Norris showed why he is among the best in the field. He had to fight in dirty air and drain his tyres in the attempt to follow and pass Leclerc. It was only on lap 21 that he passed, but Verstappen was now almost 11 seconds ahead. During the second stint, Norris had to pass Leclerc again - Leclerc had stopped earlier and got back ahead in time.
At the heart of Norris' malaise was not a lack of will or speed, but thermals: the softs he was given after his stop had already been used for six laps 'qualified' and the top layer overheated as soon as he got close to a predecessor. Overheating carcass reduces grip dramatically. With 10 laps to go, Norris reported over the radio that he had lost his tyres. His engineer Will Joseph kept his cool and advised throttle down to lower carcass temperature - a clever intervention that allowed Norris to attack later anyway.
A missed opportunity and lessons for McLaren
Norris eventually overtook Leclerc in a battle of fine steering sense and daring: five laps before the end an overtaking move into Turn 1, later a crucial pass via the dirty inside line into Turn 12. But it was not enough to threaten Verstappen. The conclusion is sharp: McLaren could have won the race, but external factors and an unfortunate strategic position made that impossible.
In practical terms, this means McLaren needs to learn two things: better anticipation of changing weather and wind conditions, and even more stringent tyre management in long stints. In addition, Oscar Piastri's weekend shows another style issue: on low-grip circuits, he is structurally two tenths behind Norris, something the team needs to work on.
In the end, Verstappen remains cool: he rates his title chances at '50/50′. For McLaren, it is clear: speed alone is no longer enough. Tactics, tyre physics and the ability to predict invisible factors such as wind will determine the outcome.
EN 
NL 
DE